Should We Accept Steroid Use in Sports?Blakes Awesome Research Paper. Sports Should athletes be able to use performance enhancing drugs. Should athletes be able to use performance enhancing drugs. The argument topic I chose is the question: Proponents argue that athletes should be able to use these drugs to better there athleticism.
Should Steroid Use Be Accepted in Sports? - Drug Use in Sports - bestallcialis.top
Blakes Awesome Research Paper. Sports Should athletes be able to use performance enhancing drugs. Should athletes be able to use performance enhancing drugs. The argument topic I chose is the question: Proponents argue that athletes should be able to use these drugs to better there athleticism. Critics say that there are many health issues with constant use of performance drugs such as steroids. This resource is good because it looks at the different angles of why these drugs should not be used by athletes.
It looks at the harm these do as well as the integrity of the sport and fairness. This hits on two of the topics in my thesis statement. The author gives clear detail about why they should be banned and has good arguments in favor of banning them. Credibility of the source: The author go's to the University of Calgary and is in the doctoral program there.
He specialized in moral philosophy and debates. He is now a teacher and knows what he is talking about in this field.
This resource is good for my first topic as it talks about the multiple health risk of PED. It talks about the biggest ones on the market today and how some are being made undetectable to drug test.
The author has made known that the risks outweigh the benefits in most all cases and that is in agreement with what I am saying on the topic. This source is credible because it is a well known and trusted site.
It has many different authors who all have phd's in the field of topic. They tend to talk about the health risks more than anything with there background but it is credible. Mayo Clinic, 12 Dec. This resource will mainly come into play in the second paragraph. This talks about the unfairness of these drugs between athletes. He goes into detail of why its unfair as well as what it would be like if everyone did it. He also talks about some of the health factors of them which is good for my first body paragraph.
This was written by an English professor at Cambridge University. He is also a copy editor for origin magazine. He knows how to write as well as credible information to put in his paper.
This is why he is credible. This resource hits on all the topics at hand. It has several experts put there researched opinions and debate. They look at both sides of the argument and build there case. Jeffrey Katz is a freelance writer in the New York area. He is self employed and writes mainly on sports topics like these. He is a great writer and does not use bad information in his articles. He focuses his points in the debate in his article.
This resource is peer edited and talks about the negatives of drug use in athletes. It hits on the health factor as well as the negatives of the game. This is the peer edited source from NC live. Peter is a credible source because he writes for a living. Also his information has been peer reviewed by another person so he will not have useless or bogus information.
Fry, and Patricia G. Socialization in Drug Abuse. Sports Should athletes be able to use performance enhancing drugs Sitemap. Should athletes be able to use performance enhancing drugs Description of topic: A sport then will have integrity if it stays consistent to a core set of principles. Through surgery, through proper nutrition informed by the latest science , through foreign devices eye-glasses we seem to gain advantages that prior generations of players did not have.
In such an environment, the use of performance-enhancing drugs has become increasingly common. Besides making muscles bigger, anabolic steroids may help athletes recover from a hard workout more quickly by reducing the muscle damage that occurs during the session. But sport itself is far more dangerous, and we don't prohibit it.